|

Quantum Tunnel of Love
By: Bob Sireno
Burn-in: The time during the early period of use when a component or
cable exhibits measurable changes in performance, that eventually
stabilize, resulting in consistent performance for a significant
period of time thereafter. Things happen to be more complex than
this simple definition of burn-in might lead one to believe. To gain
a fuller understanding we must ask: what transpires inside of a
circuit that causes it to stabilize? Why, after a period of time, is
a device no longer subject to “drift”? This paper proposes answers
to these questions. But first, let me put forth my position on
hi-end audio before the technical stuff begins.
I am a scientist, by trade, and therefore an objectivist. Twenty two
years of experience on the job has taught me that all phenomena is
measurable, but, not all phenomena can presently be measured. The
technology of the measuring tool is not always adequate to measure
empirical reality. People tend to accept this proposition in all
areas other than audio.
I am also an audiophile. I hear differences in equipment, and in
cables. I hear sonic changes that take place over time. I believe
that audiophiles have better aural perception (not the same as
hearing!) than the bulk of humanity, and that adequate test
equipment needed to verify the subtleties they claim to hear in some
cases, does not yet exist. Today we’ll look into the atomic world,
where the explanations may exist for the sonic changes that seem to
occur in our equipment and cables with the passage of time.
Atoms and molecules have recently been filmed in motion. PBS
broadcast one of the first “;atomic movies”; several years ago. The
show was called STEM. I was stunned. Up close, electrons literally
look like thinly connected beads of gas. The depth of micro-reality
made visible with a Scanning Tunneling Electron Microscope is
incredible. The behavior of individual atoms was chaotic. Some
appeared lethargic; temporarily bonding to others, while some were
constantly moving. All of the atoms eventually paired off, vibrated,
and moved on to pair off again, sometimes in groups of three or
more.
What happens to the seemingly content atoms in a conductor when
electrical pressure is applied? What happens when electron waves are
driven through the circuitry of a new amp, CD player, cable, etc.,
(going through what we call its burn-in period) that causes some
people to claim that nothing occurs because it can’t be measured, or
to cause others to claim that a sweeter sound, or at least a
different sound, is born over time and use?
Cables are made of metal crystals, typically copper or silver,
containing spherically symmetrical positive ions, through which
electrons move. The purest metal also contains one ten-thousandth of
a percent, or so, of impurities. Each electron passing through a
cable makes a series of left and right turns around those atomic
impurities until it emerges.(1) What happens during this journey,
multiplied by trillions, changes the nature of the cable
sufficiently to affect the sound you hear over a period of time.
Metal crystals contain grain boundaries. A grain boundary is where
two crystals meet, oriented so that their atoms are usually aligned
in different directions. Researchers at Cornell University developed
an x-ray technique that allowed them to probe the internal structure
of grain interfaces. The results showed that atoms at grain
boundaries appeared to vibrate 50 percent more energetically than
non-boundary atoms.(2) Electrons tend toward lower energy levels, so
when electrical pressure is applied, the increased energy brings
about a slow reorientation of the atoms at the grain boundaries.
Afterwards, any reoriented atoms would vibrate less energetically.
The outcome of the reorientation of atoms is less electron
scattering resulting in improved electrical wave phase coherence.(3)
Dr. Robert Frank of Augustana College told me that “ion mobility
leads to the migration of atoms over time...and to the movement of
oxygen, carbon, hydrogen gas and hydrocarbon impurities” He stated
that ion movement in copper wiring would probably occur over several
months, creating a change in the filter nature, and a subtle change
in the capacitance of the metal. To the extent that all cabling can
be described mathematically as a filter device, a change in this
aspect could cause a sonic deviation over time.
I believe the ion transfer Dr. Frank described, along with grain
boundary reorientation, results in lower electron orbital levels in
many of the boundary area atoms. These changes, induced over a
period of time, may very well be the type of changes that are
responsible, in part, for the burn-in effects that some audiophiles
claim to hear.
While researching the concept of burn-in, I discovered a book
entitled “Quantum Aspects Of Molecular Motions In Solids”. This
fascinating, but highly pedantic book, focuses on the various
aspects of quantum tunneling In the book there is a paper that
describes the influence electrons have on the quantum tunneling of
hydrogen atoms in a metal. The same paper also discusses rotational
tunneling of methane, a simple hydrocarbon, in metal.(4) In other
words, at least two of the common impurities found in electrical
conductors, move slowly, by quantum tunneling, when electrical
pressure is applied. The result, once again, is less electron
scattering and a physical change in the conductor itself at a
molecular level.
Quantum tunneling is a surprisingly common event. It occurs in every
electrical connection, where a thin oxide layer has formed over a
metal conductor. As long as the oxide layer remains thin, electrons
can, and will, tunnel through the layer.(5) I propose that electrons
will not always detour around impurities in a wire, but will tunnel
their way through impurities that are small enough to allow the
activity to occur. In either case pathways of conductivity are
established during days, weeks, and months of use through the actual
conductor themselves. Like the water reeling down a babbling brook,
the electrons go around, or eventually thorough, boulders of
impurity, always choosing the route of least resistance.
It appears that your new components, or cables, do indeed improve up
to a point when the system they are in is left on for extended
periods of time Obviously, there is a point at which no more
perceptible change occurs. Why is that? Well, unfortunately
electrons will continue to scatter around the remaining impurities,
even after burn-in. Can circuits be designed that will not exhibit
electron scattering, or burn-in? Yes, it is possible to design a
circuit that is so small that the signal paths are the thickness of
a single electron wavelength. The result is called a quantum wire.
Efforts to make a practical quantum wire have so far failed. But,
once again, theory is fast becoming reality.
AT&T’s Bell labs is working on a resistor that allows but a single
electron through at a time.(6) Researchers at the University of
California at Santa Barbara have assembled quantum wires one
electron at a time.(7) Japanese scientists at the Optoelectronics
Technology Research Laboratory, near Tokyo, believe that before
quantum wires can be easily fabricated a deeper understanding of
what happens on an atomic level during epitaxial (crystal) growth is
needed, and are working toward that goal.( 8 ) An American company,
Texas Instruments, has developed a tiny device called the BiQuaRTT,
or bipolar quantum resonant tunneling transistor. At only two
specific voltages, electrons tunnel through the circuit barriers
causing current flow. Integrated circuits will be next. Someday
quantum wire production will be perfected, along with the necessary
IC’s, and we’ll have an entirely new generation of amplifiers,
preamps and such.
When quantum wires become commercial and are fully utilized, perhaps
in 20 to 25 years, the reproduced signal approaching the final
amplification stages will be as perfect as possible, and cable
burn-in will no longer be a subject of dispute. To fully utilize
quantum wires, and minimize electron scattering, the final
amplification stage may need to be located at, or in, the speaker.
One can only hope that improved recording techniques will match the
hardware development that will inevitably occur.
Scientifically, there is no doubt that the propagation of electrons
through a conductor changes with time and use. These changes are
minute, and measurable with only the most advanced of devices. But,
they exist. And to exist means that claims concerning audibility
must be taken seriously. Only a few years ago, audiophiles
complained that circuits employing negative feedback affected the
sound of amplifiers adversely. The number crunchers denied it
because the distortion figures were so much improved with the use of
feedback. Turns out the audiophiles were right... that may be the
case again.
1-7-2012
addendum:
Researchers
led by Michelle
Simmons of the Center for Quantum Computation and Communication
Technology at the School of Physics of the University of New South
Wales in Sydney have achieved quantum wires of 1.5-nm that do not
exhibit high resistance. Reference:
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/335/6064/64
FOOTNOTES:
1) Martin C. Guitzwiller, “Quantum Chaos” Scientific American,
January 1992, p. 83.
2) Science News, November 26, 1988, p. 348.
3) F. Capasso, “Evolution of Quantum Semi-conductor Devices”
Physics of Quantum Electron Devices, ed. Austin, Engl, Sugano,
(Berlin 1990).
4) A. Huller and L. Baetz, “The Temperature Dependence Of
Rotational Tunneling Simulation of a Quantum System at Finite
Temperatures”; Quantum Aspects of Molecular Motion in Solids,
(Berlin 1987).
5) Robert Eisberg and Robert Resnick, Quantum Physics of Atoms,
Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and Particles, (New York 1974)
6) Elizabeth Corcoran, “Diminishing Dimensions” Scientific
American, November 1990, p.130.
7) ibid. p.129.
8 ) ibid. pp. 128-129.
Quantum Tunnel of Love originally appeared in issue 8a,9a/92 of Bound for
Sound.
Thanks to Marty DeWulf, the man with the best audio perception on
our planet, for long ago granting me permission to use the article.
return to J&R
PC home page
|